A November New York State casino referendum for voters has one lawyer questioning the ballot's wording
In November, New York voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that would enable several casino that is new become built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn lawyer is effective, that referendum shall be halted due to language within the ballot question that he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum carries a number of 'legislative purposes' that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For instance, the question mentions 'promoting task growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting neighborhood governments to lower property taxes.' That language was approved by the State Board of Elections in July.
But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. According to a lawsuit filed within the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution's prohibition on the utilization of general public money in the aid of 'private undertakings.'
'The Constitution is pretty clear that you cannot use money that is public sway or influence a vote,' Snyder said.
Snyder isn't the one that is only has brought up problems with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and religious groups have also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could attend the advertised advantages of casino expansion.